Legal Opinion
Martens v. Martens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We do not here find such unusual circumstances as would take the ease out of the general rule that counsel fee and allowance for disbursements should only be granted for prospective and not past services.
It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Sussman v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961