Lee v. Garland

On Motion For Rehearing.

Candler, Justice.

Since it appears from the allegations of the petition in this case that the attorney to whom the note and security deed were given did represent the maker threeof in person in the case in which he was employed until final judgment was rendered therein, Code §§ 9-615 and 9-616, and the case of Weed v. Bond, 21 Ga. 195, relied on by the maker, have no application here, for the reasons pointed out in Copeland v. Eubanks, 175 Ga. 198 (165 S. E. 3). It appears from the record that the charge pending against the person indicted was that of murder, and a plea…