Legal Opinion

Huffer v. Herman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 22, 1896Published

Action for Personal Injuries.—Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. James Goggin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

This case presents the question whether there is any theory which the testimony of the defendant in error will support upon -which he is entitled to recover.

That testimony is that he was eighteen years old, employed by the plaintiffs in error in a factory where there was a planing machine for planing boards, without being told what he would have to do, and for several days he worked at sandpapering lumber; was then placed at the planing machine and told how to put the board through, and “ whenever the shavings get piled up, you should clean them away; ” had never seen a planing machine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago Anderson Pressed Brick Co. v. ReinneigerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Chicago Anderson Pressed Brick Co. v. ReiningerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API