Legal Opinion
Gross v. New York City Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.
Petitioner seeks to compel respondents to accept his application for a liquor license for on-premises consumption and to have rule 45 of the respondent board declared invalid. Petitioner’s license is for sale of beer and cider at retail in his restaurant. Application for on-premises sale of hard liquor, etc., has been refused. Petitioner must show a clear right to the relief sought (Colucci v. O’Connell, 129 N. Y. S. 2d 613, affd. 283 App. Div. 964). The discretion of respondents board and Authority, respectively, is broad and must necessarily be such in the area of their separate and joint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bertholf v. . O'ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. BohlingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kaplan v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gross v. New York City Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959