Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rose, S.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2015No. 26 WAP 2014PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

The issue in this discretionary appeal is whether a defendant convicted of third-degree murder must be sentenced under the sentencing statute in effect at the time the defendant committed the ultimately deadly assault upon the victim, or whether the defendant is subject to an enhanced penalty pursuant to a subsequently-enacted sentencing statute which *662was in effect at the time of the victim’s death 14 years later. As we conclude that imposition of a sentence in excess of that prescribed by statute at the time the defendant committed the deadly assault violates and is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. KizakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Com. v. Santana, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Culbert, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Cunnane, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API