Legal Opinion

Hariri v. MORSE RUBBER PRODUCTS CO.

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1990No. 89-1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYDEN, Judge.

Vahid Hariri was employed by Electener-gy Technologies, Inc. (E.T.I.). He went to the Morse Rubber Plant (Morse) to conduct an energy study to induce Morse to hire E.T.I. as a consultant. While Hariri was conducting a power factor test, a fire occurred and Hariri was severely burned.

Hariri’s primary contention was a circuit panel was improperly marked and the lighting in the power room was poor. Testimony at trial indicated the central panel as marked “480-3 Main To Everything,” and contained 480 volts. The right panel, containing 2,300 volts, was unmarked. Hariri hooked up a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BohlkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. White v. Citizens National Bank of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Mayrath Company v. HelgesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Miller v. BonarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Gordon v. NoelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crookham v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Glenn v. CarlstromSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Gerace v. 3-D Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
  4. State of Iowa v. Shanna DessingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  5. State of Iowa v. Shanna DessingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API