Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1992No. CR-90-1514PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Peter Carroll, pleaded guilty to charges of possession of cocaine. He was sentenced to four years' imprisonment; however, his sentence was suspended and, instead, he was placed on two years' probation upon his spending one year in confinement and undergoing drug treatment and counseling.

The appellant contends that the sentencing court denied him his constitutional right to equal protection when it sentenced him to a punishment that was more severe than that imposed upon his codefendant. The appellant claims that the judge sentenced the appellant to a greater punishment than the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Wheatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. S.H. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. City of Montgomery v. NormanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API