Legal Opinion

Hirth v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1897No. 2,025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Wiley, J. —

Appellant was plaintiff below, and sued appellee to recover damages to her property, occasioned by changing the grade of one of its streets, after such grade had once been established by ordinance, and she had made improvements in the way of erecting buildings, etc., according to; and in conformity with the grade as established.

The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first paragraph of the complaint avers that since March, 1890, she has been, and is still, the owner of lot 72 in out lot 14, Drake’s addition to the city of Indianapolis, also lot 1 in out lot 17 in McCormick’s Heirs’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Mayor of New YorkCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Lewis v. StoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Imler v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morris v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Gonzalez v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Butler v. City of KokomoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. City of Globe v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API