Legal Opinion

Pentz v. Pennsylvania

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1953No. 14513PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, H. Pentz, has brought the present action against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, alleging in his complaint that he is a resident of Texas. The question of whether this allegation of residence is equivalent to an allegation of citizenship is discussed below.

Section 2 of Article III of the Federal Constitution provides: “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases * * * between a State and Citizens of another State * *

The Eleventh Amendment to the Federal Constitution clarifies the meaning of the quoted portion of Article III by granting to the states immunity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Bell Telephone Company of Penna. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Hunkin-Conkey Const. Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Gerstman v. PooleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Sappington v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Martin v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API