Legal Opinion
McGuinness v. Hertz Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 1, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered on or about September 29, 2003, which denied defendant and third-party plaintiff Barney Skanska Construction Co.’s motion for summary judgment seeking (1) dismissal of plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 240 (1), § 241 (6) and § 200 claims, and (2) indemnification against third-party defendant, holding that the indemnification agreement was void as against public policy under General Obligations Law § 5-322.1, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting summary judgment *161dismissing plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 240 (1) and §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reilly v. Newireen AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Dutton v. Charles Pankow Builders, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Loiacono v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Shields v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Linarello v. City University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dwyer v. Goldman Sachs Headquarters LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Murray v. Lancaster Motorsports, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Keller v. KrugerNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Fontaine v. Juniper AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re: World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020