Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bullock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1978No. 172PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

The instant appeal arises from appellant’s conviction for robbery, attempted rape and two counts of aggravated assault. On appeal appellant argues: (1) The court erred in failing to suppress identification testimony as well as physical evidence linking appellant to the crime; (2) The court erred in refusing to dismiss the case under Rule 1100; and (3) The evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions on attempted rape and aggravated assault. We disagree and will affirm.

At approximately 5:30 A. M. on August 31, 1976, Joan Kirby alighted from a trolley at Broad Street and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Bobby Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. MoyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. VanderlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. WadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API