Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bradley v. Lightcap

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1903Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fulton county; the Hon. George W. Thompson, Judge, presiding".

1DissentJustice Wilkin

It is a rule of universal application that where a mortgagor, after foreclosure and sale, allows the time of redemption fixed by the statute and decree of foreclosure to expire without justifiable excuse, failing to make redemption his rights are forever gone. In Stephens v. Illinois Mutual Ins. Co. 43 Ill. 327, the question being whether a mortgagor had an insurable interest in the mortgaged property after a decree of foreclosure and sale, we said (p. 331): “At the time of the fire, then, the' position of Stephens was substantially that of a mortgagor with a right to redeem. * * * That in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stephens v. Illinois Mutual Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Ryhiner v. FrankIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Keith v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Peterson v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API