Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Flach

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action upon contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $2,218 on an implied agreement to pay for the maintenance, education and support of John C. Kienzle, the infant «on of the defendant’s testator, from the time said infant son was nine years of age, when bis mother, Evelyn Kienzle, died, np to his sixteenth year. The agreed statement of facts submitted for decision follows:

*227The plaintiff for the period of tíme mentioned in the complaint had control and custody of the infant son of the testator and supplied the necessaries alleged therein, and the amount charged for the maintenance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. . AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Murphy v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Carpenter v. NewlandNew York Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounting of Proceedings of the Estate of NeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
  2. In re the Estate of O'NeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  3. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API