Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brinkley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1958No. 29,926Published

1DissentDavidson, Judge

When my brethren dispose of this case upon the theory that the overruling of the motion for new trial denied to appellant the right of appeal, I do not know whether they are leading me, or themselves, up a blind alley.

No one is complaining, here, of the overruling of the motion for new trial. Appellant is not complaining of any error committed in the overruling of the motion for new trial because of matters alleged therein.

In so far as this record is concerned, the only purpose served by the motion for new trial was to keep the conviction from becoming final.

The sole and only matter now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dallas Storage & Warehouse Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Mahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Connell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Daumery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API