Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Vickers

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1921No. 2492Published

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Edward F. Lunsford, Judge. Divorce suit by Robert E. Vickers against Victoria T. Vickers. From order refusing to set aside judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The trial court is without jurisdiction to pass upon an order previously made by a court of coordinate j urisdiction, if such order affect a substantial right.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Edward F. Lunsford, Judge. Divorce suit by Robert E. Vickers against Victoria T. Vickers. From order refusing to set aside judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The trial court is without jurisdiction to pass upon an order previously made by a court of coordinate j urisdiction, if such order affect a substantial right. Silver & Co. v. Waterman, 111 N. Y. S. 456; Heischober v. Polishook, 136 N. Y. S. 567; Sloan v. Beard, 110 N. Y. S. 1; Blaustein v. Lyon, 132 N. Y. S. 387. The identical facts were before the court by the renewed…

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

Counsel have filed a very earnest petition for a rehearing. It is said that it is presented in the best of good faith, and that we did not formerly pass upon some of the questions urged in the original brief. We are satisfied of the good faith of counsel, and commend them for the concise and perspicuous manner in which their contentions are presented. It may be that our former opinion did not squarely dispose of the questions urged, *294though we think it did in substance. However, we take pleasure in giving serious consideration to the petition,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Twaddle v. Board of County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API