Legal Opinion

Chapman v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1936No. 10291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANE, Justice.

In the year 1926 Miss Enla Atwood and Associates were developing certain properties within the city limits of the City of Houston. Under the charter and ordinances of said city, all new streets established in the city are required to conform with existing streets, grades, etc. The ordinances pleaded by the plaintiff in this suit, and the city charter, place the exclusive control, location, etc., of all streets in the city council and in the city engineering department, and no new street can be opened, located, paved, improved, etc., except with the consent of city council and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Corpus Christi v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. City of Houston v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API