Legal Opinion

Eichart v. Bargas

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 29, 1851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Fokc. Det. Case 90. Cas*e stated. Appeal from the Jefferson Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice SmrsoN

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

This was a warrant for a forcible detainer sued out by Bargas and wife, against Eichart. The inquest of the jury was in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs traversed the inquest, and upon the trial in Court,, the jury found the defendant guilty of the forcible de-tainer complained of. The Cornt entered a judgment of restitution, and the defendant has appealed.

The plaintiffs read as evidence upon the trial, a lease-in the following words, viz:

“Caroline Huber leases unto Daniel Eichart for the term of three years, from and after the 25th September 1850,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Espen v. HinchliffeIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Edwards-Pickering Co. v. RodesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Paducah Home Oil Company v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Vulcan Materials Company v. David W. Reed & The David W. Reed Revocable TrustDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
  5. Wolfer v. HurstOregon Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API