Legal Opinion

United States v. Oxylance Corporation

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 9, 1990No. Civ. A. 1:89-CV-1967-MHSPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SHOOB, District Judge.

The sole issue in this bankruptcy appeal is whether it is necessary to serve notice of objections to claims to the local United States Attorney and the Attorney General of the United States when the claimant is the Internal Revenue Service. In this case, appellee delivered its objection and hearing notice to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) alone. The bankruptcy court held that the service was adequate and disallowed the priority claim made by the government. For the reasons stated below, the Court reluctantly must reverse. 1

Bankruptcy Rule 3007 governs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. In Re MorrellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
  3. United States v. Simms (In Re Simms)District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
  4. In Re HejlUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Levoy (In Re Levoy)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Boykin v. Marriott International, Inc. (In Re Boykin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  3. In Re Lomas Financial Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1997
  4. In Re HawthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. In Re WilkinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API