Legal Opinion

Byrd D. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaRksoN, J.

Tbe only exception and assignment of error made by defendant was that “His Honor erred in rendering and signing judgment in this cause.” Tbe question involved: Was chapter 352 of tbe Public Laws of tbe General Assembly of North Carolina, ratified 15 March, 1941, available to plaintiff under tbe facts in this case? We think so.

Chapter 120, Public Laws 1929 (Workmen’s Compensation Law), was amended as follows: Chapter 352, Public Laws 19-11—

“Section 1. That Chapter one hundred and twenty of tbe Public Laws of one thousand nine hundred and twenty-nine, as amended, be further amended by adding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Hicks v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Tabor v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. Gillespie v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Martin v. . VanlaninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Smith v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. United Roasters, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1980
  4. Smith v. EAGLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. North Carolina State Bar v. DuMontCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API