Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Sorrell

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 18, 1998No. 96-1381; Crim.App. No. 31701Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSullivan, Judge

The lower court stated that the assistant staff judge advocate, Major Garrard, was not disqualified from preparing the post-trial recommendation in this case. I disagree. Clearly, there was a material factual dispute in this ease between Major Garrard and appellant as to the existence of a post-trial agreement to secure clemency. Under the decisions of this Court in United States v. Lynch, 39 MJ 223, 228 (1994), and United States v. Decker, 15 MJ 416, 418 (1983), it was error for such an officer to prepare or assist in preparation of the post-trial recommendation.

In the case at bar, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LynchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. DeckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API