Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Kummer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1913No. 7963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Jefferson District Court. — Hon. Charles • McCall, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This is an action to determine and settle a disputed boundary line. The ease was tried on an agreed statement of fact. Prom this it appears that on the 5th day of December, 1887, one William C. Smith, who was then the owner of the premises involved, filed for record with the county clerk and recorder of Jefferson county, his plat and statement duly acknowledged. This statement was as follows:

“Know all men by these presents: That I have subdivided the east one-half (E. y2) of the southeast quarter (SE. yff) of section thirty-four (Sec. 34), township three south (T. 3 S.), range sixty-nine west…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burbach v. SchweinlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Fraser v. OttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kretschmer v. HardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schutze v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Willy v. LieuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Crenshaw v. HolzbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Morrissey v. AchzigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Morrissey v. AchzigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API