Legal Opinion

Stoner v. COLVIN, ET UX.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1959No. 41072PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The main issue in this case relates to the validity of an order consolidating for trial separate actions by different plaintiffs, against a common defendant, for injuries arising out of the same accident. We hold that the order is valid, and affirm the judgments of the circuit court.

The appellees, Arthur H. Colvin and his wife, Mrs. Arthur H. Colvin, filed separate suits against Mrs. Lacy Stoner, appellant, to recover damages for personal injuries received from an automobile collision. The court ordered the suits to be consolidated for trial. The jury rendered a verdict for Mr. Colvin in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gwin v. FountainMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. HicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Planters' Oil Mill v. Yazoo & M. v. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mississippi Central Railroad v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Giguere v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fowler Butane Gas Co. v. VarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fielder v. Magnolia Beverage Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Smith v. HC Bailey CompaniesMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. US FIDELITY & GUAR. COMPANY v. Estate of FrancisMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Karenina by Vronsky v. PresleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API