Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartigan v. Board of Regents

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1901Published

Application of J. W. Hartigan for a writ of prohibition against George C. Sturgiss and others.

1DissentDent, Judge

1. By tlie terms of the statute authorizing their creation professorships in the State University are as to the removal of the incumbents quasi-public offices and no such removal can be operative or valid until good cause shown after notice, and an opportunity of defense has been afforded the incumbent proposed to be removed.

2. By good cause is meant some just cause affecting materially the interest and well being of the university.

3. The 'acts of the regents of the university in its government and control in all proper cases is subject to review by the courts by certiorari, mandamus' and…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API