Homrich v. Homrich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 194, Oct. T., 1920, by respondent, from decree of C. P. Berks County, April T., 1919, No. 41, granting a divorce in the case of Peter Homrich v. Lizzie Homrich. Libel in divorce. Before Wagner, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The case was referred to George M. Ermentrout, Esq., as master, who recommended that a divorce should be granted. On exceptions to the master’s report the conrt dismissed the exceptions and granted a divorce.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 194, Oct. T., 1920, by respondent, from decree of C. P. Berks County, April T., 1919, No. 41, granting a divorce in the case of Peter Homrich v. Lizzie Homrich. Libel in divorce. Before Wagner, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The case was referred to George M. Ermentrout, Esq., as master, who recommended that a divorce should be granted. On exceptions to the master’s report the conrt dismissed the exceptions and granted a divorce. Error assigned, among others, was the decree of the conrt.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, P. J.,
Each of the five assignments in.this appeal allege an error of the court below in overruling the exceptions filed to the report of the master. The validity of the decree depends on the sufficiency of the testimony adduced before the master to warrant his conclusions of fact and law, which were all reviewed in the opinion filed by the court below sustaining his report, in entering a decree of divorce.
After a careful examination of the whole record we feel that the determination of the master and the learned trial judge was fully justified. The right to the divorce, on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Koch v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941