Legal Opinion
Chevron Corp. v. Salazar
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2011No. Nos. 11 Civ. 3718(LAK), 11 Civ. 0691(LAK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.
The background of these actions has been fully explained in a number of previous opinions by the Court,1 familiarity with which is *424assumed. The matter now is before the Court on the motion of Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”) in No. 11 Civ. 3718(LAK) for an order compelling the two Lago Agrio Plaintiff Representatives (the “LAP Representatives”) who have appeared in this action to compel Pablo Fajardo Mendoza (“Fajardo”), Juan Pablo Saenz (“Saenz”), Julio Prieto Mendez (“Prieto”), and Luis Francisco Yanza (“Yanza”) to appear for depositions.
Facts
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re Chevron CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Chevron Corp. v. BerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- In Re Chevron Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. SalazarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Kintetsu World Express (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Dialectic Distribution LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States v. LauraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Yuchen Justin Sun v. David Geffen and Ithaka Trust; Le Nez, a sculptureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Yuchen Justin Sun v. David Geffen, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025