Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Byars

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 27, 1953No. 5-32Published

1DissentEd. F. McFaddin, Justice

I respectfully dissent because — as I see it — the majority opinion of this Court shows that it has invaded the province of the jury.

Our Constitution says, in Art. 2, § 7:

“The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, and shall extend to all cases at law, without regard to the amount in controversy; . . .”

Under this salutary provision, this Court has always held — even in eminent domain proceedings — (a) that the jury’s verdict will not be disturbed on appeal if supported by substantial evidence; and (b) that in viewing tbe evidence — to see if it is substantial — we view it in the light…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fort Smith & Van Buren District v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railroad v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  3. Railway v. CombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  4. Springfield & Memphis Railway v. RheaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  5. Texas & St. Louis Railway Co. v. EddySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API