Legal Opinion
Boymer v. Birmelin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 21, 1969No. 68-913PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
227 So.2d 358 (1969)
Ray BOYMER and Mary Boymer, Husband and Wife, Appellants,
v.
Robert C. BIRMELIN, Appellee.
No. 68-913.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
October 21, 1969.
Rehearing Denied November 7, 1969.
Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, for appellants.
Goodman & Peterson, Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
CHARLES CARROLL, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below from an adverse judgment, entered following trial without a jury, in an action on a promissory note.
The defendant did not dispute the making and delivery, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Valparaiso v. LongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Biro v. GeiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Hyman v. Succession of ParkersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Shockney v. MarshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by10 opinions
- Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Burger King Corp. v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. The Black Clawson Company, Standard Alliance Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Black Clawson Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- CITIBANK INTERN. v. MercoglianoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- City of South Miami v. DembinskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.