Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Estate of Smaling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

I join the portions of the majority’s decision that find Appellant’s issues are not waived and that affirm the conclusion that the will in question was procured by undue influence. However, I respectfully dissent to the extent that the majority reverses the determination of the orphans’ court that the testator lacked testamentary capacity on October 29, 2008.

William O. Smaling died on December 31, 2009, and, on January 22, 2010, the Register of Wills of Monroe County (the “Register”) admitted to probate a will dated April 11, 2005, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BosleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. In re Estate of StrahsmeierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Estate of ZeeveringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Est. of D.A.B., Appeal of: Byerley, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API