Legal Opinion

People v. Alexander

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 2015No. B256482PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

— Defendant and appellant Rickey Lane Alexander II appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350) 1 following his plea of no contest.

Defendant contends that the 16-month county jail sentence ultimately imposed by the trial court is illegal because his punishment was in excess of the plea agreement. Defendant requests that we reverse the judgment and order him “returned to the status quo ante prior to the sentencing, and if the court cannot fashion a sentence that meets [defendant’s] approval, to allow [defendant] to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. Superior Court (Giron)California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. RAVAUXCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Allen CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. White CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API