Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clymer v. Summit Bancorp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 7, 2002Published

1Dissent

STEIN and LONG, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Kestin’s thoughtful opinion for the Appellate Division, Clymer v. Summit Bancorp., 334 N.J.Super. 252, 253-57, 758 A.2d 652 (2000).

For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI — 5.

For affirmance — Justices STEIN and LONG — 2.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clymer v. Summit BancorpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000