Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Dungan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1863Published

Error to the court of common pleas of Jackson county. Reserved in the district court. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrinkerhoff, J.

This case is a petition in error, prosecuted to reverse a judgment of the court of common pleas of Jackson county, reserved for decision by this court. The plaintiff in error was the defendant below, and the defendants in error were the plaintiffs below.

From tbe record it appears that tbe plaintiffs below, as executors, etc., of Reese P. Thompson, deceased, brought suit against the defendant below on a note of band, for $4050, given by him to them in their character as executors.

Tbe defendant answered, in substance :

1. Denying that tbe plaintiffs, at tbe time of tbe giving o'f the note sued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sumner v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  2. The Monte AllegreSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Thompson v. MungerTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. George v. BeanMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Seely v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API