Legal Opinion

Graham v. Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment setting aside a conveyance, a contract, an agreement and a mortgage, and granting other relief, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The acts of which the plaintiffs complain were those of defendant James B. Fisher. Neither fraud nor duress was established. The parties were in legal effect dealing at arm’s length. The plaintiff James S. Graham was in grave financial difficulties which, unaided, he was unable to solve. He voluntarily invited the assistance of Fisher, who was, as he knew, an experienced man with executive capacity and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Paper-Board Co. v. Iroquois Pulp & Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. United Paperboard Co. v. Iroquois Pulp & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graham v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API