Brennan v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
This case began when the Secretary of Labor sued the respondent real estate management company for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U. S. C. § 201 et seq. The Secretary sought an injunction against future violations of the minimum wage, overtime, and recordkeeping provisions of the Act, as well as back wages for the affected employees. An employee is entitled to the benefits of the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Act if he is, inter alia, “employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Van LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. E. E. Falk, Individually and as a Partner in Drucker and FalkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor v. Clyde H. Hebert and Cotulla Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Shultz v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by87 opinions
- Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor v. A-One Medical Services, Inc. Alternative Rehabilitation Home Healthcare, Inc. Lorraine Black and Hanahn KormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation & ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.