Legal Opinion

Arthur L. Lawrence and Alma P. Lawrence v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1958No. 15532PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

When a taxpayer has made a full disclosure of his “position” with respect to his gross income on his income tax return (a disclosure that would arrest the attention of the Internal Revenue Service upon its examination of the return), but has not “included” the amount involved as taxable, is the Collector of Internal Revenue subject to the ordinary three year limitation of § 275(a) 1 or to the special five year statute, § 275(c), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 ? 2

No fraud was suggested. 3

The Tax Court, rejecting Slaff v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 220 F.2d 65, held the five year statute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. The Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  3. George Slaff v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Bokum v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
  2. Lardas v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. Heman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Swanson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
  5. Tobler v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API