Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Punsky v. Clay County Sheriff's Office

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 2009No. 1D07-3901Published

1Concurring in the judgmentBenton, J.

Until and unless the supreme court modifies its decision in Caldwell v. Division of Retirement, Florida Department of Administration, 372 So.2d 438 (Fla.1979), or the Legislature amends section 112.18(1), Florida Statutes, we are bound to follow Caldwell. See Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So.2d 431, 440 (Fla.1973). While suggesting that Caldwell was wrongly decided to begin with, the per curiam opinion purports to accept this proposition. In at least one respect, however, the per curiam opinion misreads Caldwell: The view that a claimant entitled to the section 112.18(1) presumption must buttress the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Caldwell v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Walgreen Co. v. CarverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Bivens v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Butler v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API