Legal Opinion

Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co. v. Arnold

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1965No. A-10374PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

E. H. Arnold sued Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and obtained a judgment on a verdict for $90,000 for injuries to his back. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 381 S.W.2d 388. Railroad, petitioner here, urges a reversal because the trial court submitted two issues too broadly, improperly defined the term “suitable equipment,” and plaintiff’s attorney engaged in prejudicial argument in telling the jurors the effect of their answers to the issues. We are inclined to the view that these points would not require a reversal, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. A. F. Jones & Sons v. Republic Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Heldt Brothers Trucks v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Duncan v. TweedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API