Legal Opinion

Azar v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 9, 2015No. Appellate Case 2014-000032; 27573Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

The City of Columbia generates approximately $110 million in revenue from user fees each year by providing water and sewer services. For more than a decade, the City has been allocating substantial amounts of this revenue to its General Fund and for economic development purposes. Appellants filed this action contending the City’s practices violate sections 6-1-330 and 6-21-440 of the South Carolina Code. The trial court granted the City summary judgment. Because there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the City’s expenditures of water and sewer revenues were lawful, we reverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Hancock v. Mid-South Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API