Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. Gleason

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 2004No. 4D03-105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant appeals a new trial order entered after a jury found the plaintiff had not sustained injury as the result of an accident in which the defendant stipulated to liability. The defendant seeks reversal of the order and reinstatement of the jury verdict. Alternatively, the defendant requests that the new trial be limited to damages for orthopedic and soft tissue injuries. We grant the alternative relief requested and reverse and remand the case for entry of an order limiting the new trial to damages related to the plaintiffs orthopedic and soft tissue injuries.

The plaintiff was a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Estate of StuckeySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. North Dade Golf, Inc. v. ClarkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John Moriarty & Associates of Florida v. Murton Roofing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Kuebler v. FerrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Barbara Loren v. Once Upon a Time Group, Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  4. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. BarbanellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API