Legal Opinion

Preseault v. City of Burlington

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 13, 2006No. Docket No. 04-1154-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants J. Paul and Patricia Preseault filed suit against the City of Burlington and the State of Vermont alleging that the installation of a fiber-optic cable over a portion of their property, without compensation to them, violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The claim was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and sought money damages and injunctive relief. The State of Vermont was sued as the successor-in-title to the railroad that held a right-of-way on the property. The City was sued because it had installed the fiber-optic cable on existing utility poles under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Chevalier v. TylerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  3. Proctor v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. Preseault v. City Of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Preseault v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Preseault v. City Of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API