Legal Opinion

State v. Bryan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2004No. 2001-0253PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, defendant-appellant, Quisi Bryan, raises 19 propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors and compared his sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentence of death.

{¶ 2} On June 25, 2000, Cleveland police officer Wayne Leon stopped a car driven by Quisi Bryan, the defendant-appellant, because of an altered temporary license tag on the back of the car. Unknown to…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API