Legal Opinion

Papenheim v. Lovell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1996No. 95-1341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This case is here on second appeal to determine the measure of damages to an automobile. We reverse and remand for entry of judgment in accordance with this opinion.

In Papenheim v. Lovell, 530 N.W.2d 668 (Iowa 1995), one of the issues we decided was the appropriate rule to apply as the measure of damages to plaintiff Papenheim’s automobile that was admittedly damaged by defendant. On remand, the trial court fixed the damages and entered judgment for the plaintiff. Papenheim now claims that the trial court misapplied the rule as set out in deciding the original appeal.

This is a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Waukon Auto Supply v. Farmers & Merchants Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Frantz v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Papenheim v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Halferty v. Hawkeye Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evans v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Brian L. Evans Vs. Judy Benson And Bluffs Psychiatric Associates, P.c.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API