Legal Opinion

Watler v. The M/V Sea Lane

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 14, 1964No. 63-138PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULTON, District Judge.

This is a cause in admiralty. The Libelant seeks relief in rem against a vessel, which is now known as the M/V “SEA LANE” but which bore the name of M/V “LILLIAN” when this alleged cause of action accrued.

The Libelant seeks double wage penalties under the provisions of Title 46 U.S.C.A. § 596.

This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this cause of action.

The libel alleges that wages were wrongfully withheld from Libelant for the period from December 28, 1962 through January 2, 1963; and that pursuant to said statute, Libelant is entitled…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Collie v. FergussonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. John J. McConville v. Florida Towing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. THE" GRACE LOTHROP"Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. The TraderDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1926
  5. Forster v. Oro Navigation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alier v. Sea Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
  2. Vincent Sylvis v. Rouge Steel Company, a Subsidiary of Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API