Trenchard v. Elderkin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
ARREAD FROM THE COURT OF TIIE FIRST DISTRICT. •The plaintiff sued for a settlement of the accounts of a vessel, owned in partnership with the defendant, and the latter appealed from a judgment rendered against him. The grounds upon which a motion was made to dismiss the appeal, as well as the facts necessary to a full understanding of the case, are stated at large in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.
The record of appeal in this case, is certified to in the following woids i cc I hereby certify, that the above and fore8'°ing thirty-two pages, do contain a full and complete transcript of the record of the case, wherein John Trenchard is plaintiff, and George Elderkin is defendant.” Signed, Jno. L. Lewis, clerk.
A motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground of the certificate not being conformable to law; and the 586th and 896th articles of the Code of Practice, were relied on in *295support of the application. Whereupon, the appellant under the 898 article, of the work just cited, moved…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Credit Service CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Borzone v. BurkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884
- Burke v. ErwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
- Corlis v. TylerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.