Legal Opinion

In Re New Jersey & New York Railroad Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 18, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

23 N.J. Super. 1 (1952)

92 A.2d 515

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF THE NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK RAILROAD COMPANY TO DISCONTINUE THE OPERATION OF TRAIN NUMBER 613.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 14, 1952.

Decided November 18, 1952.

Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and CONLON.

Mr. Justin W. Seymour argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Seymour & Seymour, attorneys for Peter Duryea, trustee of the property of the New Jersey and New York Railroad Company).

Mr. Maurice A. Walsh argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Fahy & Walsh, attorneys for the Borough of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Bullock v. Florida Ex Rel. Railroad Comm'n of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Mississippi Railroad Commission v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Transit Commuters Ass'n v. BD. OF PUB. UTIL. COMM'RSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Application of Central R. Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Banta v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API