Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 28, 2020No. 7:19-cv-00299Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 28, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION OMA LEE ESPINOZA § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:19-cv-00299 § STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE § INSURANCE COMPANY, § § Defendant. § OPINION AND ORDER The Court now considers “Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition of State Farm Corporate Representative Under Rule 30(b)(6) and Deposition of Claims Adjuster,”1 Defendant’s response,2 and Plaintiff’s reply.3 The Court also considers “Defendant’s Opposed Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Records and Affidavits Concerning Cost and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API