Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Contessa Sportswear, Ltd. & Saugerties Mfg. Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbthub G. Klein, J.

Motion to stay respondents from proceeding further with separate hearings on demands for arbitration made by the corporate respondents, and directing that said demands for arbitration be heard before a single panel of arbitrators is denied. In effect, petitioner is requesting this *51court to consolidate arbitration proceedings, a power held and exercised by the courts under the Civil Practice Act (Matter of Symphony Fabrics Corp. [Bernson Silk Mills], 12 N Y 2d 409, 412; Matter of Adam Cons. Ind. [Miller Bros. Hat Co.], 6 A D 2d 515). However, it now appears that with the enactment of the CPLR,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Met Food Corp. v. M. Eisenberg & Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gillespie & Co. of New York, Inc. v. Coleport Fabrics, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API