Koehler v. Syracuse Specialty Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Concurring opinion. For majority opinion, see 42 N. Y. Supp. 182.
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
The exceptions we are to consider upon this appeal were taken to the court’s refusal to nonsuit the plaintiff, and to the charge of the court. The court submitted to the jury the questions whether the defendant gave the plaintiff a proper place to work in, taking into account the stool and the floor, and whether it gave him proper instructions in reference to the way that the plaintiff should work there, and whether the defendant should not have furnished an iron of the kind described, or something to take its place, in placing the backs in, and removing them; and the appellant insists that,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crown v. . OrrNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Buckley v. Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- McCarragher v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Brennan v. . GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Ogley v. . MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koehler v. Syracuse Specialty Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896