Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1992No. 60109PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

The State appeals the grant of defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict of the jury on a charge of first-degree sexual abuse. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was charged with one count each of forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986; forcible sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1986; and first-degree sexual abuse, § 566.100, RSMo 1986. He was found not guilty on the forcible rape and forcible sodomy charges but convicted of first-degree sexual abuse.1 He moved for a judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict on that count. The trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. McCallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. CreasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. DewittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API