Mississinewa Mining Co. v. Andrews
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Grant Superior Court; Hiram Brownlee, Judge, Action by Robert Andrews against-the Mississinewa, Mining Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
It is assigned as error that the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause-of action. Upon suggestion of counsel for the appellee, we have examined the record on appeal on file in the office of the clerk of this court in cause No. 2,864, Mississinewa Mining Co. v. Andrews, 22 Ind. App. 523 and we find it to-be the cause now again before us. On the former appeal-the overruling of a demurrer to the complaint, for want of facts, was assigned as error, and this court held the complaint to be sufficient on demurrer. Afterward, in the court, below, the cause was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cluggish v. KoonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Mississinewa Mining Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Alerding v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Studabaker v. FaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912