Richardson Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7982 (T. D. 36770). [Oral argument, May 3,1917, by Mr. Lane and Mr. Hanson.]
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION.
Barber, Judge:
I feel constrained to disagree with my associates in this case.
The carbureters in question are made in Canada under Canadian patents by the Windsor Machine & Tool Works solely for the Rumley Products Co., a concern located in Laporte, Ind., which company owns the patents.
The. entrant, in whose name this controversy is litigated, is a customs broker who makes entries of merchandise from Canada on behalf of the Rumley Products Co., the real importers.
At the time these importations were made, it is shown that the Rumley Co. manufactured the same carbureters in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Township of East Oakland v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Alabama v. MontagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- United States v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Jackman v. LambertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.